Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization

858 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 858 indexed citations. Written by Maxim Imakaev, Geoffrey Fudenberg, Rachel Patton McCord, N. M. Naumova, Anton Goloborodko, Bryan R. Lajoie, Job Dekker and Leonid A. Mirny covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Genetics and Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (812 citations), Plant Science (335 citations) and Genetics (155 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2148.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026