Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data

2.5k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 2.5k indexed citations. Written by Tal Yarkoni, Russell A. Poldrack, Thomas E. Nichols, David C. Van Essen and Tor D. Wager covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (2.0k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (509 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (357 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1635.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026