Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq

751 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 751 indexed citations. Written by Manuel Garber, Manfred Grabherr, Mitchell Guttman and Cole Trapnell covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (528 citations), Cancer Research (154 citations) and Plant Science (136 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1613.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026