Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture

1.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 1.1k indexed citations. Written by Guokai Chen, Daniel R. Gulbranson, Zhonggang Hou, Jennifer M. Bolin, Victor Ruotti, Mitchell D. Probasco, Sara E. Howden, Nicholas E. Propson, Jessica Antosiewicz‐Bourget and Joyce Teng covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (925 citations), Biomedical Engineering (372 citations) and Surgery (221 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1593.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026