Protein localization in electron micrographs using fluorescence nanoscopy

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 286 indexed citations. Written by Shigeki Watanabe, Gunther Hollopeter, Katrin I. Willig, Robert J. Hobson, M. Wayne Davis, Stefan W. Hell and Erik M. Jørgensen covering the research area of Structural Biology, Molecular Biology and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biophysics (192 citations), Structural Biology (175 citations) and Molecular Biology (121 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Protein localization in electron micrographs using fluorescence nanoscopy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Protein localization in electron micrographs using fluorescence nanoscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Protein localization in electron micrographs using fluorescence nanoscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Protein localization in electron micrographs using fluorescence nanoscopy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Protein localization in electron micrographs using fluorescence nanoscopy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Protein localization in electron micrographs using fluorescence nanoscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Protein localization in electron micrographs using fluorescence nanoscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1537.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026