Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples

592 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2008, received 592 indexed citations. Written by Manuel F. Juette, Travis J. Gould, Mark D. Lessard, Michael J. Mlodzianoski, Brian Bennett, Samuel T. Hess and Joerg Bewersdorf covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biophysics (518 citations), Biomedical Engineering (266 citations) and Structural Biology (259 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1211.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026