Polaritons in layered two-dimensional materials
- Journal
- Nature Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nmat4792 →Countries where authors are citing Polaritons in layered two-dimensional materials
This map shows the geographic impact of Polaritons in layered two-dimensional materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Polaritons in layered two-dimensional materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polaritons in layered two-dimensional materials more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Polaritons in layered two-dimensional materials
This network shows the impact of Polaritons in layered two-dimensional materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Polaritons in layered two-dimensional materials.
About Polaritons in layered two-dimensional materials
This paper, published in 2016, received 961 indexed citations . Written by Tony Low, Andrey Chaves, Joshua D. Caldwell, Anshuman Kumar, Nicholas X. Fang, Phaedon Avouris, Tony F. Heinz, F. Guinea, L. Martı́n-Moreno and Frank H. L. Koppens covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (560 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (446 citations) and Materials Chemistry (372 citations). Published in Nature Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmat4792.