Self-assembly of metal–polymer analogues of amphiphilic triblock copolymers

730 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 730 indexed citations. Written by Zhihong Nie, Daniele Fava, Eugenia Kumacheva, Shan Zou, Gilbert C. Walker and Michael Rubinstein covering the research area of Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (493 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (378 citations) and Organic Chemistry (197 citations). Published in Nature Materials.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/nmat1954 →

Countries where authors are citing Self-assembly of metal–polymer analogues of amphiphilic triblock copolymers

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Self-assembly of metal–polymer analogues of amphiphilic triblock copolymers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Self-assembly of metal–polymer analogues of amphiphilic triblock copolymers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Self-assembly of metal–polymer analogues of amphiphilic triblock copolymers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Self-assembly of metal–polymer analogues of amphiphilic triblock copolymers

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Self-assembly of metal–polymer analogues of amphiphilic triblock copolymers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Self-assembly of metal–polymer analogues of amphiphilic triblock copolymers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmat1954.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026