Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis
- Journal
- Nature Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nm1613 →Countries where authors are citing Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis
This map shows the geographic impact of Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis
This network shows the impact of Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis.
About Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis
This paper, published in 2007, received 1.7k indexed citations . Written by Elisabeth M. Zeisberg, Oleg Tarnavski, Michael Zeisberg, Adam L. Dorfman, Julie R. McMullen, Erika Gustafsson, Anil Chandraker, Xueli Yuan, William T. Pu and Anita B. Roberts covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (923 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (571 citations) and Surgery (368 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm1613.