Possible new role for NF-κB in the resolution of inflammation
- Journal
- Nature Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nm1201-1291 →Countries where authors are citing Possible new role for NF-κB in the resolution of inflammation
This map shows the geographic impact of Possible new role for NF-κB in the resolution of inflammation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Possible new role for NF-κB in the resolution of inflammation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Possible new role for NF-κB in the resolution of inflammation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Possible new role for NF-κB in the resolution of inflammation
This network shows the impact of Possible new role for NF-κB in the resolution of inflammation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Possible new role for NF-κB in the resolution of inflammation.
About Possible new role for NF-κB in the resolution of inflammation
This paper, published in 2001, received 643 indexed citations . Written by Toby Lawrence, Derek W. Gilroy, Paul Colville‐Nash and D. A. Willoughby covering the research area of Cancer Research, Immunology and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology (268 citations), Molecular Biology (247 citations), Cancer Research (202 citations), Oncology (80 citations) and Pharmacology (56 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm1201-1291.