Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: Restoration by IFN-γ treatment

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 902 indexed citations. Written by Felix Randow, Uta Syrbe, Dietmar Krausch, K. Asadullah, Petra Reinke, Hans‐Dieter Volk and Wolfgang Kox covering the research area of Immunology, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology (587 citations), Epidemiology (474 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (166 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.

Countries where authors are citing Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: Restoration by IFN-γ treatment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: Restoration by IFN-γ treatment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: Restoration by IFN-γ treatment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: Restoration by IFN-γ treatment more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: Restoration by IFN-γ treatment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: Restoration by IFN-γ treatment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: Restoration by IFN-γ treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm0697-678.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026