Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing

624 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2014, received 624 indexed citations. Written by Zongli Zheng, Matthew Liebers, Boryana Zhelyazkova, Yi Cao, Kerry D. Lynch, Juxiang Chen, Hayley Robinson, Hyo Sup Shim, Juliann Chmielecki and William Pao covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (292 citations), Molecular Biology (266 citations) and Oncology (211 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/nm.3729 →

Countries where authors are citing Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm.3729.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026