Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics

2.0k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2008, received 2.0k indexed citations. Written by Frank Diehl, Kerstin Schmidt, Michael A. Choti, Katharine Romans, Steven N. Goodman, Meng Li, Katherine A. Thornton, Nishant Agrawal, Lori J. Sokoll and Steve Szabo covering the research area of Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cancer Research (1.7k citations), Oncology (857 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (803 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/nm.1789 →

Countries where authors are citing Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm.1789.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026