Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 852 indexed citations. Written by Christian Frøkjær‐Jensen, M. Wayne Davis, Christopher E. Hopkins, Blake Newman, Søren‐Peter Olesen, Morten Grunnet and Erik M. Jørgensen covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Aging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (615 citations), Aging (601 citations) and Cell Biology (178 citations). Published in Nature Genetics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/ng.248 →

Countries where authors are citing Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ng.248.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026