Countries where authors are citing Ultrafast spontaneous emission source using plasmonic nanoantennas

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ultrafast spontaneous emission source using plasmonic nanoantennas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ultrafast spontaneous emission source using plasmonic nanoantennas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ultrafast spontaneous emission source using plasmonic nanoantennas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Ultrafast spontaneous emission source using plasmonic nanoantennas

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Ultrafast spontaneous emission source using plasmonic nanoantennas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ultrafast spontaneous emission source using plasmonic nanoantennas.

About Ultrafast spontaneous emission source using plasmonic nanoantennas

This paper, published in 2015, received 353 indexed citations . Written by Thang B. Hoang, Gleb M. Akselrod, Christos Argyropoulos, Jiani Huang, David R. Smith and Maiken H. Mikkelsen covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (260 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (213 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (136 citations). Published in Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8788.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026