Lead iodide perovskite light-emitting field-effect transistor
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8383 →Countries where authors are citing Lead iodide perovskite light-emitting field-effect transistor
This map shows the geographic impact of Lead iodide perovskite light-emitting field-effect transistor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lead iodide perovskite light-emitting field-effect transistor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lead iodide perovskite light-emitting field-effect transistor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Lead iodide perovskite light-emitting field-effect transistor
This network shows the impact of Lead iodide perovskite light-emitting field-effect transistor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Lead iodide perovskite light-emitting field-effect transistor.
About Lead iodide perovskite light-emitting field-effect transistor
This paper, published in 2015, received 662 indexed citations . Written by Xin Yu Chin, Daniele Cortecchia, Jun Yin, Annalisa Bruno and Cesare Soci covering the research area of Polymers and Plastics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (651 citations), Materials Chemistry (476 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (198 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8383.