Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7933 →Countries where authors are citing Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres
This map shows the geographic impact of Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres
This network shows the impact of Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres.
About Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres
This paper, published in 2015, received 586 indexed citations . Written by Jetze Visser, Ferry P.W. Melchels, June Jeon, Erik M. van Bussel, L. S. Kimpton, Helen M. Byrne, Wouter J.A. Dhert, Paul D. Dalton, Dietmar W. Hutmacher and Jos Malda covering the research area of Rheumatology, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (429 citations), Biomaterials (229 citations) and Automotive Engineering (183 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7933.