Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode

351 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2015, received 351 indexed citations. Written by Atef Shalabney, Jino George, James A. Hutchison, Guido Pupillo, Cyriaque Genet and Thomas W. Ebbesen covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (324 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (140 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (139 citations). Published in Nature Communications.

Countries where authors are citing Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6981.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026