Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6076 →Countries where authors are citing Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles
This map shows the geographic impact of Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles
This network shows the impact of Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles.
About Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles
This paper, published in 2014, received 370 indexed citations . Written by Katharine Grant, Eelco J. Rohling, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Hai Cheng, R. Lawrence Edwards, Fabio Florindo, David Heslop, Fabrizio Marra, Andrew P. Roberts and M. E. Tamisiea covering the research area of Environmental Chemistry, Earth-Surface Processes and Atmospheric Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (312 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (142 citations) and Ecology (77 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6076.