Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5176 →Countries where authors are citing Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework
This map shows the geographic impact of Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework
This network shows the impact of Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework.
About Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework
This paper, published in 2014, received 612 indexed citations . Written by Matthew J. Cliffe, Wei Wan, Xiaodong Zou, Philip A. Chater, A. K. Kleppe, Matthew G. Tucker, H. Wilhelm, Nicholas P. Funnell, François‐Xavier Coudert and Andrew L. Goodwin covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (552 citations), Materials Chemistry (436 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (86 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5176.