High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5016 →Countries where authors are citing High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters
This map shows the geographic impact of High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters
This network shows the impact of High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters.
About High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters
This paper, published in 2014, received 978 indexed citations . Written by Hajime Nakanotani, Takahiro Higuchi, Taro Furukawa, Kei Morimoto, Masaki Numata, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Yuta Sagara, Takuma Yasuda and Chihaya Adachi covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (920 citations), Materials Chemistry (669 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (118 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5016.