The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4833 →Countries where authors are citing The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato
This map shows the geographic impact of The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato
This network shows the impact of The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato.
About The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato
This paper, published in 2014, received 440 indexed citations . Written by Nicolas Sierro, James N. D. Battey, Sonia Ouadi, Nicolas Bakaher, Lucien Bovet, Simon Goepfert, Manuel C. Peitsch and Nikolai V. Ivanov covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (342 citations), Molecular Biology (291 citations) and Biotechnology (40 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4833.