Coal as an abundant source of graphene quantum dots
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3943 →Countries where authors are citing Coal as an abundant source of graphene quantum dots
This map shows the geographic impact of Coal as an abundant source of graphene quantum dots. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coal as an abundant source of graphene quantum dots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coal as an abundant source of graphene quantum dots more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Coal as an abundant source of graphene quantum dots
This network shows the impact of Coal as an abundant source of graphene quantum dots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Coal as an abundant source of graphene quantum dots.
About Coal as an abundant source of graphene quantum dots
This paper, published in 2013, received 701 indexed citations . Written by Ruquan Ye, Changsheng Xiang, Jian Lin, Zhiwei Peng, Kewei Huang, Zheng Yan, Nathan P. Cook, Errol L. G. Samuel, Chih-Chau Hwang and Gedeng Ruan covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (604 citations), Biomedical Engineering (232 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (112 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3943.