A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2234 →Countries where authors are citing A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material
This map shows the geographic impact of A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material
This network shows the impact of A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material.
About A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material
This paper, published in 2012, received 456 indexed citations . Written by Yu Zhu, Lei Li, Chenguang Zhang, Gilberto Casillas, Zhengzong Sun, Zheng Yan, Gedeng Ruan, Zhiwei Peng, Abdul‐Rahman O. Raji and Carter Kittrell covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (276 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (226 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (223 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2234.