Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1877 →Countries where authors are citing Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers
This map shows the geographic impact of Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers
This network shows the impact of Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers.
About Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers
This paper, published in 2012, received 883 indexed citations . Written by Yang Zhao, Mikhail A. Belkin and Andrea Alù covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (769 citations), Biomedical Engineering (436 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (373 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1877.