Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12151 →Countries where authors are citing Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant
This map shows the geographic impact of Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant
This network shows the impact of Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant.
About Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant
This paper, published in 2016, received 651 indexed citations . Written by Maggie R. Wagner, Derek S. Lundberg, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Susannah G. Tringe, Jeffery L. Dangl and Thomas Mitchell‐Olds covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (547 citations), Cell Biology (157 citations) and Molecular Biology (125 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12151.