Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis
- Authors
- Paola BonfanteAndrea Genre
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1046 →Countries where authors are citing Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis
This map shows the geographic impact of Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis
This network shows the impact of Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis.
About Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis
This paper, published in 2010, received 834 indexed citations . Written by Paola Bonfante and Andrea Genre covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (764 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (133 citations) and Pharmacology (116 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1046.