Experimental investigation of classical and quantum correlations under decoherence
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1005 →Countries where authors are citing Experimental investigation of classical and quantum correlations under decoherence
This map shows the geographic impact of Experimental investigation of classical and quantum correlations under decoherence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Experimental investigation of classical and quantum correlations under decoherence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental investigation of classical and quantum correlations under decoherence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Experimental investigation of classical and quantum correlations under decoherence
This network shows the impact of Experimental investigation of classical and quantum correlations under decoherence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Experimental investigation of classical and quantum correlations under decoherence.
About Experimental investigation of classical and quantum correlations under decoherence
This paper, published in 2010, received 351 indexed citations . Written by Jin‐Shi Xu, Xiao‐Ye Xu, Chuan‐Feng Li, Chengjie Zhang, Xu‐Bo Zou and Guang‐Can Guo covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (311 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (303 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (29 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1005.