Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2
- Journal
- Nature Cell Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncb954 →Countries where authors are citing Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2
This map shows the geographic impact of Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2
This network shows the impact of Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2.
About Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2
This paper, published in 2003, received 583 indexed citations . Written by Joseph R. Pomerening, Eduardo D. Sontag and James E. Ferrell covering the research area of Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (502 citations), Cell Biology (200 citations) and Genetics (75 citations). Published in Nature Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncb954.