Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks

696 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1999, received 696 indexed citations. Written by Markus Diesmann, Marc-Oliver Gewaltig and Ad Aertsen covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (632 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (355 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (203 citations). Published in Nature.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/990101 →

Countries where authors are citing Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/990101.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026