Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels
- Journal
- Nature Neuroscience
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/8084 →Countries where authors are citing Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels
This map shows the geographic impact of Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels
This network shows the impact of Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels.
About Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels
This paper, published in 1999, received 529 indexed citations . Written by Amanda Patel, Éric Honoré, Florian Lesage, Michel Fink, Georges Romey and Michel Lazdunski covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (380 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (293 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (110 citations). Published in Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/8084.