Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 690 indexed citations. Written by Markus Arndt, Olaf Nairz, Claudia Keller and Anton Zeilinger covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (597 citations), Artificial Intelligence (292 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (115 citations). Published in Nature.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/44348 →

Countries where authors are citing Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/44348.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026