Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans

643 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1997, received 643 indexed citations. Written by Leonardo Cohen, Pablo Celnik, A. Pascual–Leone, James M. Dambrosia, Manabu Honda, Norihiro Sadato, Christian Gerloff, Martin Catala and Maurice B. Hallett covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (560 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (251 citations) and Neurology (112 citations). Published in Nature.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/38278 →

Countries where authors are citing Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/38278.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026