A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles

976 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2000, received 976 indexed citations. Written by K. Mark Ansel, Vu N. Ngo, Paul Hyman, Sanjiv A. Luther, Reinhold Förster, Jonathon D. Sedgwick, Jeffrey L. Browning, Martin Lipp and Jason G. Cyster covering the research area of Immunology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology (770 citations), Oncology (298 citations) and Molecular Biology (107 citations). Published in Nature.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/35018581 →

Countries where authors are citing A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/35018581.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026