Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/35002001 →Countries where authors are citing Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs
This map shows the geographic impact of Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs
This network shows the impact of Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs.
About Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs
This paper, published in 2000, received 504 indexed citations . Written by C. J. Myatt, B. E. King, Q. A. Turchette, C. A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, Wayne M. Itano, C. Monroe and D. J. Wineland covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (466 citations), Artificial Intelligence (396 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (113 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/35002001.