Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/33859 →Countries where authors are citing Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries
This map shows the geographic impact of Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries
This network shows the impact of Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries.
About Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries
This paper, published in 1998, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Michael Mann, Raymond S. Bradley and Malcolm K. Hughes covering the research area of Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (1.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (796 citations) and Ecology (115 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/33859.