Isolation of cDNA clones encoding T cell-specific membrane-associated proteins

974 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1984, received 974 indexed citations. Written by Stephen Μ. Hedrick, David I. Cohen, Ellen A. Nielsen and Mark M. Davis covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Immunology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology (617 citations), Molecular Biology (372 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (254 citations). Published in Nature.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/308149a0 →

Countries where authors are citing Isolation of cDNA clones encoding T cell-specific membrane-associated proteins

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Isolation of cDNA clones encoding T cell-specific membrane-associated proteins. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isolation of cDNA clones encoding T cell-specific membrane-associated proteins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isolation of cDNA clones encoding T cell-specific membrane-associated proteins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Isolation of cDNA clones encoding T cell-specific membrane-associated proteins

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Isolation of cDNA clones encoding T cell-specific membrane-associated proteins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Isolation of cDNA clones encoding T cell-specific membrane-associated proteins.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/308149a0.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026