Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/30735 →Countries where authors are citing Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons
This map shows the geographic impact of Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons
This network shows the impact of Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons.
About Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons
This paper, published in 1998, received 526 indexed citations . Written by Lyle J. Borg-Graham, Cyril Monier and Yves Frégnac covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (488 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (371 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (57 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/30735.