Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/30498 →Countries where authors are citing Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game
This map shows the geographic impact of Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game
This network shows the impact of Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game.
About Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game
This paper, published in 1998, received 880 indexed citations . Written by Matthias J. Koepp, Roger N. Gunn, Andrew D. Lawrence, Vincent J. Cunningham, Alain Dagher, Terry Jones, David J. Brooks, C. J. Bench and Paul M. Grasby covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (336 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (235 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (195 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/30498.