Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change
- Authors
- Mingkui CaoF. I. Woodward
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/30460 →Countries where authors are citing Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change
This map shows the geographic impact of Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change
This network shows the impact of Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change.
About Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change
This paper, published in 1998, received 544 indexed citations . Written by Mingkui Cao and F. I. Woodward covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (402 citations), Ecology (178 citations) and Atmospheric Science (141 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/30460.