Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/30455 →Countries where authors are citing Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming
This map shows the geographic impact of Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming
This network shows the impact of Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming.
About Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming
This paper, published in 1998, received 718 indexed citations . Written by Jorge L. Sarmiento, Tertia M. C. Hughes, Ronald J. Stouffer and Syukuro Manabe covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change and Oceanography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oceanography (556 citations), Global and Planetary Change (296 citations) and Ecology (175 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/30455.