Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction

1.4k indexed citations
published 1982
Journal
Nature

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/296643a0 →

Countries where authors are citing Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction.

About Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction

This paper, published in 1982, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Bo Barker Jørgensen covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change and Oceanography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Environmental Chemistry (687 citations), Ecology (623 citations) and Oceanography (494 citations). Published in Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/296643a0.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026