A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Authors
- H. C. Longuet–Higgins
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/293133a0 →Countries where authors are citing A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections
This map shows the geographic impact of A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections
This network shows the impact of A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections.
About A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections
This paper, published in 1981, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by H. C. Longuet–Higgins covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.4k citations), Aerospace Engineering (778 citations) and Media Technology (217 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/293133a0.