Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/283167a0 →Countries where authors are citing Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils
This map shows the geographic impact of Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils
This network shows the impact of Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils.
About Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils
This paper, published in 1980, received 775 indexed citations . Written by Joseph J. H. Ackerman, Thomas H. Grove, Gordon Wong, David G. Gadian and George K. Radda covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (569 citations), Spectroscopy (300 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (209 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/283167a0.