Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/23655 →Countries where authors are citing Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms
This map shows the geographic impact of Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms
This network shows the impact of Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms.
About Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms
This paper, published in 1999, received 614 indexed citations . Written by Achim Peters, Keng Yeow Chung and Steven Chu covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (540 citations), Artificial Intelligence (101 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (73 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/23655.