Nuclear fusion from explosions of femtosecond laser-heated deuterium clusters
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/19037 →Countries where authors are citing Nuclear fusion from explosions of femtosecond laser-heated deuterium clusters
This map shows the geographic impact of Nuclear fusion from explosions of femtosecond laser-heated deuterium clusters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nuclear fusion from explosions of femtosecond laser-heated deuterium clusters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nuclear fusion from explosions of femtosecond laser-heated deuterium clusters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nuclear fusion from explosions of femtosecond laser-heated deuterium clusters
This network shows the impact of Nuclear fusion from explosions of femtosecond laser-heated deuterium clusters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nuclear fusion from explosions of femtosecond laser-heated deuterium clusters.
About Nuclear fusion from explosions of femtosecond laser-heated deuterium clusters
This paper, published in 1999, received 613 indexed citations . Written by T. Ditmire, J. Zweiback, V. Yanovsky, T. E. Cowan, Graeme C. Hays and K. B. Wharton covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (428 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (403 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (361 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/19037.