Nitrogen deposition makes a minor contribution to carbon sequestration in temperate forests
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/18205 →Countries where authors are citing Nitrogen deposition makes a minor contribution to carbon sequestration in temperate forests
This map shows the geographic impact of Nitrogen deposition makes a minor contribution to carbon sequestration in temperate forests. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nitrogen deposition makes a minor contribution to carbon sequestration in temperate forests with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nitrogen deposition makes a minor contribution to carbon sequestration in temperate forests more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nitrogen deposition makes a minor contribution to carbon sequestration in temperate forests
This network shows the impact of Nitrogen deposition makes a minor contribution to carbon sequestration in temperate forests. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nitrogen deposition makes a minor contribution to carbon sequestration in temperate forests.
About Nitrogen deposition makes a minor contribution to carbon sequestration in temperate forests
This paper, published in 1999, received 599 indexed citations . Written by Knute J. Nadelhoffer, Bridget A. Emmett, Per Gundersen, O. Janne Kjønaas, Chris Koopmans, Patrick Schleppi, Albert Tietema and Richard F. Wright covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Soil Science (346 citations), Global and Planetary Change (278 citations) and Ecology (274 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/18205.