Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/17401 →Countries where authors are citing Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism
This map shows the geographic impact of Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism
This network shows the impact of Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism.
About Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism
This paper, published in 1999, received 887 indexed citations . Written by Minoru Hojo, Takashi Morimoto, Mary A. Maluccio, Tomohiko Asano, Kengo Morimoto, Milagros Lagman, Toshikazu Shimbo and Manikkam Suthanthiran covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Immunology and Hematology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (443 citations), Molecular Biology (246 citations) and Epidemiology (237 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/17401.