Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species
- Journal
- Nature Biotechnology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/13657 →Countries where authors are citing Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species
This map shows the geographic impact of Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species
This network shows the impact of Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species.
About Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species
This paper, published in 1999, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Mikhail V. Matz, Arkady F. Fradkov, Yulii A. Labas, Alexander P. Savitsky, Andrey G. Zaraisky, Mikhail L. Markelov and Sergey Lukyanov covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (1.0k citations), Biophysics (708 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (240 citations). Published in Nature Biotechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/13657.