Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 537 indexed citations. Written by David Whitcombe, Simon P. Guy, Tom Brown and Steven R. Little covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (381 citations), Biomedical Engineering (84 citations) and Ecology (73 citations). Published in Nature Biotechnology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/11751 →

Countries where authors are citing Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/11751.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026